815362

Global warming is a controversial issue that can affect the world globally in the coming years (reword, "global warming...affect the world globally"). Through (though) there is much evidence of the severity of global warming, there are still skeptics towards this theory. What theory? Global warming is real. When making policies, leaders should consider the importance and authenticity as well as the ecological and economical affects of global warming.﻿ What do you mean authenticity. Need to be more specific, exactly what are the key issues that they should focus on. What kinds of policies will the public respond to

Though there are critics who say that global warming is not real, there is substantial evidence that proves that global warming is, in fact, a detrimental affect (effect) of pollution and industrialization. According to an article from a magazine focused on environmental awareness, the world's temperature has risen "1 degree Fahrenheit" which is the "fastest rate in the last 1000 years" (Source A). The rising temperatures, most likely caused by the entrapment of CO2 and greenhouse gases, can affect the natural habitats of animals such as polar bears. When making policy, leaders should realize that global warming is an issue of great significance to Earth's future. There are also people who believe that there are more pressing issues than global warming. -n ot really relevant- One book asks if stabilizing global warming is more important than "alleviating current global suffering" (Source E). Though there are other pressing issues in the world, such as the political uprisings in Egypt and Libya, global warming is an issue that can affect the Earth as a whole. ** You forgot Tunisia, the first one of them to rebel......also, that has nothing to do with global warming, it's just distracting from your essay **By getting rid of or diminishing the amount of pollutants in the air, the Earth can live longer. Unlike global human suffering, fixing global warming will help all living organisms on Earth -- not just helping people concentrated in one area. Learning how global warming has already been affecting the Earth can help eaders realize that it is indeed a pressing issue that can help the better the Earth for future generations.

By realizing that global warming is a pressing issue, leaders can then realize that it is also very detrimental to the habitats and niches of animals. no mention of economics, which was supposed to be half of this paragraph? <--(i second that). Leaders should also consider the positive affects that can stimulate the economy. A study by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences depicts how burning of fossil fuels can trigger an early spring. Having an early spring can make birds migrate earlier, causing an overcrowding of birds and a short of food (Source F). If global warming continues, the whole ecological system may become disordered. Leaders should consider policy that can stop the release of fossil fuels in order to preserve the well being of animals threatened by the drastic change in weather. Now mentioning policy? Wasn't really mentioned in your thesis. Although leaders may be reluctant to make policies to stop global warming due to the fact that the economy might be at an expense, this is not true. If many companies and countries begin to use new technologies to cut greenhouse gases, many other companies will also have "to cut CO2 emissions or pay to pollute at the old rate" (Source C). Helping the environment will not hurt the economy. Instead, policies to stop global warming can save money and also give more jobs for making new environmentally safe inventions and designing new technologies. support this statement By considering the ecological damages that global warming has on species and the economic gain that can come withe creating policies to lower green house gases, leaders can see the benefits of making policy to decrease the affects of global warming.

Global warming can hurts all aspects on earth. The increase of pollutants can lower the span of life for humans, animals, and even the Eart. Now the question is whether leaders are willing to take a risk to save the Earth.