814547

Earth is always (no) at a constant pace of change but it has been currently rapid (weird wording) in the past twenty years. Global warming affects not only the environment, but also the world economy for paying to clean up the environment is expensive (wording is difficult to follow after the comma). In order for leaders to make policies on this area that benefit everyone, they must consider how environmental products will create a new market that will influence the drastic changes to the earth and help species remain in sync with nature. Really wordy thesis--try to cut it down and make your supports more clear, because it is currently a bit difficult to tell exactly what is going to be argued.

Many Americans preach that reducing emissions will hurt the economy, which is one of the reasons the United States did not sign the Kyoto Protocol the person reading this may not have any idea what the Kyoto Protocol is--provide at least some background. Government officials fear that cutting waste is a "direct threat to the United States economy and their chances of reelection" (E). The officials seem to fail in recognizing (to recognize) that if they find a way to solve the climate crisis, their chances of reelection will most likely double because people will support a plan for an inexpensive solution (good point!). The environment and the economy would both benefit since it would bolster "the market for pollution-control gear" (C). The myth of the economic barrier towards a clean environment can be erased with the cooperation of the United States in the Kyoto Protocol. With the new creation of a market, it will bring jobs to fellow citizens and new jobs are essential to today's financial world because the employment rate is at the lowest ever (not true). The economic leaders of America need to recognize that not only will reducing emissions raise their potential, but also the future of the country. - good, your reasons for the US joining the kyoto protocol are very strong ﻿Again, much of this paragraph was focused on the Kyoto Protocol but you never actually explained what it is. Very confusing to someone who has no idea what the Kyoto Protocol is because they don't have a clue what you're arguing for.

The argument of global warming being factual or not can finally come to a close with the proven statistical effects it has on the Earth (weird sentence structure). The policy makers need to open their eyes in order for them to see that without our world, everything they cared about would cease to exist. For the first time in one thousand years, "the world's surface temperature rose by approximately 1 degree Fahrenheit" (A). The rate at which the world is changing has rapidly increased and if we do not address the issue of global warming now, the world will melt before our eyes. Every object on this planet is affected by global warming, so why let humans be selfish when they can change the outcome themselves. The United States and Australia together "account for one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions" (A). When the majority will do nothing, it becomes difficult for the minority to make an impact. Together the world can take baby steps (informal) toward a solution, but separated we will crumble. A paragraph discussing whether Global Warming is a real problem or not should probably be the first body paragraph, otherwise you're arguing for something you haven't established. The circle of life has been in motion since the beginning of time, but is thrown off balance with the start of global warming. The World is enduring "significant weather changes and more extreme climate events" (E). All of the animals and humans are being made to adjust to a system that has previously remained constant until now. With such change, it is up to our leaders to take a stance against the unnatural way of life and protect the right of habituating in a place that has been adaptable for humans since caveman times. Since nature has rushed spring forward, the "evolutionary process of species adaption cannot keep up" (F). The change has torn apart traditions and cultures of animals with immigration being thrown off by winter coming too soon. The home of thousands of species should be cared for and not taken advantage of by selfishness.

Hana and Adam, get off my essay